Please let me know the procedure HOW to SURRENDER PAN CARD ONLINE IF COMPANY DISSOLVED
as I have submitted documents to income tax department manually for surrender but they said we have to file application online?
I am facing error while uploading SPICE form that form is old.
Whereas I have downloaded the New Forms Today itself.
I have also tried uploading AGILE form with it. But the error continues.
Private company incorporated on 8th February 2018 , and since that it has not carried out any business ..can we file form STK-2 for that ?
If yes then how to prepare statement of accounts?
And also whether we need to file financial statements to ROC for F.Y 18-19?
Can the bonus shares be issued on the basis of provisional or unaudited results?
Click here to view / answer Share it on
Is information under Reg. 30 of SEBI (SAST) sent by promoters to Stock Exchanges enough or we also have to upload in listing link?
Kindly revert Asap!!
Dear Colleague,
I am Proceeding for the incorporation of section 8 Company but while uploading the form, the error at MCA Portal is being Pop-up saying that INC 32 a is also to be accompanied as a linked Form a;long with Spice form.
However there has been no form like INC-32 a in Company Forms at MCA Portal.
Further i have also tried the same with the INC 35 Agile Form, the error at MCA portal is being pop-up that INC-32 (Spice Form) is to be filed individually in case of sec 8 Company.
Kindly suggest if anyone have solution or being facing the same Issue
Whether for the services received from a related person / distinct
person outside India, the recipient of services would be eligible for full
input tax credit?
In terms of section 12(9) of the IGST Act, 2017 the place of supply of
passenger transportation service to a person other than a registered person, shall be the place where the passenger embarks on the conveyance for a continuous journey.
In section 2 (3) of the IGST Act, 2017, the term “continuous journey” has been defined to mean a journey for which a single or more than one ticket or invoice is issued at the same time, either by a single supplier of service or through an agent acting on behalf of more than one supplier of service, and which involves no stopover between any of the legs of the journey for which one or more separate tickets or invoices are issued.
Do all stopovers cause a break in continuous journey? Does the definition of“continuous journey” include instances whereby the stopover is for any period of time?
Changes in section 185
With the very introduction of Companies Act, 2013, section 185, being a prohibitory section, was of great importance. There was no scope of any carve out or any route to apply to Central Government’s approval for non-applicability of such restrictions, unlike section 295 of the Companies Act, 1956. Further, the said section was applicable to both pubic as well as private companies, which was totally unacceptable by private companies. Then MCA vide exemption notification dated June 5, 2015[2] exempted private companies form the provisions of section 185 which brought great relief to the private companies, however, such relief is even subject to stipulated conditions. Therefore, to promote ease of doing business, the entire section has been substituted.
Deletion of the non obstante clause
The extant provision of section 185 starts with the following words “Save as otherwise provided in this Act”, which provides that if there is any other provision of the Act permitting lending as covered by the section then such specific permission shall prevail over this section. This creates confusion as to whether specific sanction of section 186 which starts with “without prejudice to the other provisions” can exclude section 185. To avoid such ambiguity the same has been omitted in the amended provision.
The new provisions of section 185 is partly restrictive and partly prohibitive
The intent of the current provisions of Section 185 is to ensure that directors who hold a fiduciary position with respect to shareholders do not utilize the funds of the company for their own benefit. However, the company laws over the world do not provide for a complete blanket prohibition on advancement of such loans/guarantee/security to directors and their related entities.
It is pertinent to note that where the shareholders of the company, being the ultimate owners, themselves approve the utilization of the funds of the company in the specified manner, the law need not create a bar on the same. Thus, at par with the global company laws, the provision has been amended to remove the prohibition to an extent and provides for the passing of shareholders’ resolution for granting of loans/guarantees/securities to entities in which directors are interested.
The amended provisions are partly prohibitive and partly restrictive. The section continues to prohibit the granting of loan/guarantee/security to some, while restricts the others in the following way:
The amended provisions allow the companies to grant loans/guarantees/securities to entities in which directors are interested, in the above mentioned restrictive cases, subject to prior approval of the shareholders by a special resolution and on the condition that such loans are utilised by the borrower for its principal business activities.