Friends,
Kindly provide your valuable suggestion on below question
Initially Transactions are not deposits and become later on or fall in Deposit definition then what compliance need to made and how auditor should deal in Audit Report.
Example- Advances received from customers are not deposits till 364 days but fall in Deposit thereafter then how company will comply and steps need to taken. Further How Statutory Auditor should deal the same.
1. Whether TDS would be applicable for payment of Leased Line Internet Charges Paid to Vodafone/Idea etc at what rate and which section.
2. Whether TDS would applicable on payment to Vodafone for Monthly Rental of VOIP/SIP Trunking Services/Telecommunication charges paid. What rate and section will apply.
Need you valuable suggestions and guidance.
Fact are as follows
ACIT has pass order under for exemption of Rs 600000 and Nil demand under Section 143(3) for for AY 2017-18 of Trust which is registered u/s 10(25) of the Act.
As per income & expenditure for the year as follows
Gross receipt Rs 1250000
Expenditure Rs 650000
Net Income Rs 600000
In return assessee fill exemption of Rs 1250000 (Gross) instead of Rs 600000 (net) for the year.
During proceedings, request made for making adjustments for clerical mistake apparent from material record.
Also submitted ITAT Delhi order in the matter of ICAI vs CPC banglor, where ITAT said for making prima facie adjustments apparent from records.
However, AO passed order of correct exemption of Rs 600000 and pass at Nil income and tax.
Further, initiated penalty of 270A for under reporting of Income in consequences of mis reporting.
1. Whether this case is of under reporting of Income
2. If yes then how taxes shall be computed and penalties.
Hello Ekta Pandey ji, you have written very nicely and much elaborating manner. I have a doubt regarding clause of Order 2016 in 3 (iii) and 3(iv). Whether Loan to Directors u/s 185 or loan & investment u/s 186 is required to be covered under clause 3(iii) "Whether the company has granted any loans, secured or unsecured to companies, firms, Limited Liability Partnerships or other parties covered in the register maintained under section 189 of the Companies Act, 2013. If so, whether the terms and conditions of the grant of such loans are not prejudicial to the company’s interest" or not. Whether contracts or arrangement constitute loan & advance u/s 188 or u/s 184(2) or only covers operational transaction like sale, purchase, leasing as specified u/s 188 only.
Click here to view / answer Share it onSeeking views of experts on provisions of section 44AD/44ADA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as follows: 1. Whether a partnership firm can claim deduction on account of salary & interest u/s 40(b) after computing income taxable on estimated basis says 8% or 6% as the case may be of Turnover or Receipt from PGBP. My view: - Till the Finance Act, 2016, under sub-section (2) of 44AD says that any deduction allowable u/s 30 to 38 shall be deemed to be allowed. There after proviso exclude deduction deemed to allow for salary & interest paid to partners, in case of firm and shall be allowed subject to limit specified u/s 40(b) of the Act. Meaning there by deduction u/s 40(b) shall be over & above income computed u/s 44AD. After amendment made by Finance Act, 2017 in section 44AD and inset new section 44ADA, said proviso has been deleted but not whole sub-section. Sub-section (2) still says that any deduction allowable u/s 30 to 38 shall be deemed to allow u/s 44AD/44ADA. This sub-section covers or clarifies only deduction from 30 to 38 only not for section 40(b) of the Act. Although Sub-section (1) overruled from section 28 to 43C and provide method of computation the taxable income. Sub section 2 deals with deduction allowable u/s 30 to 38, which shall be deemed to allow. After changes proviso deleted but still nowhere mentioned that deduction under u/s 40(b) for salary & interest to partners shall not be available. Now requested to provide your valuable inputs 2. Eligible Assesse declaring income higher than rate specified u/s 44AD & ADA under normal provisions of the Act. Still provisions of 44AD & 44ADA will be applicable? My view: For eligible assesses for eligible business provisions of 44AD & 44ADA automatically applies wherever assesses declare profit lower than prescribed rate under normal provisions of the Act. Now requested to provide your valuable inputs 3. In case of partnership firm, profit before partner’s salary & interest is higher than 8% u/s 44AD or 44ADA but after taking effect of salary profit lower than said rate. Will same also come under provisions of section 44AD & 44ADA? If yes need to get account audited for claiming lower profit? 4. Assesses having income from LIC commission or any other commission are not allowed to avail scheme of presumptive taxation u/s 44AD/44ADA. Whether they can declare profit lower than rate specified under normal provision without getting accounts audited u/s 44AB however turnover does not exceeds Rs 1 Crores. 5. Whether word “profession of accountancy” as specified u/s 44AA of the Act covers all types of accountancy works like taxation, bookkeeping, legal, financial & audited services provided by any type of assesse (Individuals, firm, Private/Limited etc) or covers those who are eligible to practice as per Chartered Accountant Act?
Click here to view / answer Share it on