In the case of an adjourned Annual General Meeting (AGM) where the financials were not approved on the originally scheduled due date but were approved during the adjourned AGM, you should file the following:
1. AOC-4: You should file AOC-4 with the unaudited financial statements by the original due date of AGM. If the financials are approved during the adjourned AGM, you will need to file an updated AOC-4 with the audited financial statements within 30 days from the date of the adjourned AGM.
2. MGT-7: Similarly, you should file MGT-7 by the original due date of AGM. If the financials are approved during the adjourned AGM, you will need to file an updated MGT-7 with the approved financials within 60 days from the date of the adjourned AGM.
The key point to remember is that even if the financials are approved during the adjourned AGM, you should still file the initial AOC-4 and MGT-7 with the unaudited financials by the original due date. After the adjourned AGM, you can file updated AOC-4 and MGT-7 with the audited and approved financials as per the specified timelines.
adjournment
case
date
would
Would having a Trademark in English Prohibit the registration of a similar Trademark in other Languages?
Hello Professionals
Whether a lending transaction would fall under the definition of digital lending only if all the processes in the life cycle of a loan, viz., customer acquisition, credit assessment, loan approval, disbursement, recovery, and associated customer service, are carried out digitally or some of the aforesaid processes can be carried out in physical mode also?
lending
definition
digital
under
would
transaction
whether
fall
Hello Professionals!
Whether a supplier of goods or services supplying through ecommerce operator would be entitled to threshold exemption?
Hello people,
Whether advance received from customers by real estate company would be considered as deposit?
Hello professionals!!
Whether financial statements circulated to members can be corrected after circulation but before adoption, by the board of director ?
Dear Members!
Mr. ‘X’ who is a promoter/director of a listed company is proposed to be appointed as WTD/CEO of the Company in terms of Sections 203, 196, 197, 198 and Schedule V of the Companies Act, 2013. Mr. X is also relative of other 2 promoter Directors of the Company. Would the appointment of Mr. X attract the provisions of Section 188(1)(f) i.e. whether holding position as WTD would tantamount to holding of office or place of profit.
party
transaction
related
attract
wtdceo
would
appointment
Is it the asset purchase price on which the GST would be levied on hiring such asset?
Click here to view / answer Share it on
