Dear all,
A director getting remuneration is an Executive director. Can this be
taken as a true and correct interpretation of the term since a proper
definition of the executive director is not mentioned in the Act?
Dear All,
With reference to the subject cited above, can someone in this group interpret the below provision of the rule.
Rule 5(2) of Nidhi Rules, 2014.
"(2) Within ninety days from the close of the first financial year after its incorporation and where applicable, the second financial year, Nidhi shall file a return of statutory compliances in Form NDH-1 along with such fee as provided in Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 with the Registrar duly certified by a company secretary in practice or a chartered accountant in practice or a cost accountant in practice."
My Understanding is : nidhi shall file statutory compliance in form NDH-1:-
Within ninety days from the close of the first financial year after its incorporation- This pertains to those companies incorporated after the said rule come into effect i.e. 2014.
where applicable, the second financial year,- This pertains to those companies incorporated prior to the said rule came into effect.
Is my understanding correct? if not, feel free to comment your interpretation accordingly
Dear All,
With reference to the subject cited above, can someone in this group interpret the below provision of the rule.
Rule 5(2) of Nidhi Rules, 2014.
"(2) Within ninety days from the close of the first financial year after its incorporation and where applicable, the second financial year, Nidhi shall file a return of statutory compliances in Form NDH-1 along with such fee as provided in Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014 with the Registrar duly certified by a company secretary in practice or a chartered accountant in practice or a cost accountant in practice."
My Understanding is : nidhi shall file statutory compliance in form NDH-1:-
Within ninety days from the close of the first financial year after its incorporation- This pertains to those companies incorporated after the said rule come into effect i.e. 2014.
where applicable, the second financial year,- This pertains to those companies incorporated prior to the said rule came into effect.
Is my understanding correct? if not, feel free to comment your interpretation accordingly
Unable to interpret and understand difference in 52(2) and 52(3) of Companies Act,2013. Please share your views on the same